tag tag 9177935658

Over One Billion Recovered

Free Confidential Case Review, No Fees Unless We Recover For You

(212) 779-0057

New York Bans Anti-Union Captive Audience Meeting Practice

If you've been injured in an accident or on the job, the attorneys of Hach & Rose, LLP have the knowledge, skills, and experience required to hold the party responsible for your injury accountable.

Last Updated: 05-15-2024
Written by: Michael A. Rose and Gregory Hach

New York Bans Anti-Union Captive Audience Meeting Practice

On September 6, 2023, New York took a significant step in protecting workers’ rights by banning mandatory captive audience meetings. Governor Kathy Hochul signed a bill amending Section 201-d of the New York Labor Law, prohibiting employers from requiring employees to attend meetings. This also includes listening to communications that primarily share the employers’ opinions on religious or political matters, including union-related topics. This groundbreaking law prevents employers from attempting to unduly influence their employees’ decisions regarding unionization.

What Is a Captive Audience Meeting?

A captive audience meeting is a mandatory gathering where an employer compels employees to listen to their views on various topics. These meetings often occur in situations where a union organizing drive, such as union elections, is underway. Employees are captives in these meetings, as they cannot refuse to attend or leave without facing potential consequences. Employers sometimes use captive audience meetings as a tool to discourage employees from supporting unionization during union organizing campaigns, which has sparked controversy around this practice.

Are Captive Audience Meetings Legal?

The legality of captive audience meetings has been a subject of debate for many years. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) declared these meetings to be illegal in 1946. However, they reversed themselves on that determination in 1953. There is no currently federal labor law banning captive audience meetings.

The NLRB says the meetings are a valid use of employer speech and that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects workers from being threatened. Employers have the right to express their views and opinions on unionization. However, critics argue that captive audience meetings inherently create a coercive environment that undermines workers’ free choice.

With the passage of the New York law banning mandatory captive audience meetings, the state has taken a stance on employer-sponsored meetings. Employers are prohibited by state law from requiring employees to attend meetings or listen to communications that primarily focus on telling workers what the employers’ opinions are regarding political, religious, or union-related issues. It is illegal for employers to take action against employees who refuse to attend these meetings or listen to communications of this nature.

NLRB Captive Audience Meetings

The NLRB is the federal agency responsible for enforcing the NLRA. They have long held that captive audience meetings are permissible under the Act. Employers could hold “compulsory audience” meetings on company property during work time to express their views on unionization.

However, in April 2022, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo challenged this long-standing precedent. In Memorandum GC 22-04, Abruzzo argued that captive audience meetings are unlawfully coercive under the NLRA and should be considered illegal. Though the NLRB has no rulings on this, Abruzzo’s position signals a potential shift in the agency’s stance on captive audience meetings. 

The NLRB’s approach to captive audience meetings has significant implications for employers and employees. If the NLRB adopted General Counsel Abruzzo’s position and declared captive audience meetings unlawful, it would represent a major victory for workers’ rights advocates and unions. Such a ruling would limit employers’ ability to hold mandatory meetings to express their views on unionization, potentially leveling the playing field in union organizing campaigns.

Employers argue that by restricting captive audience meetings, NLRB infringes upon their free speech rights under the NLRA. They maintain that these meetings provide a valuable opportunity to share information and perspectives with their employees. This is essential for fostering informed decision-making.

What to Expect in a Captive Audience Meeting

During a typical captive audience meeting, the employer or its representative requires employees to attend a gathering during work hours. At these meetings, they present information and opinions on various topics, including unionization efforts. These can take place in conference rooms, auditoriums, or even on the shop floor.

During the meeting, the employer may express their views on the potential drawbacks of unionization. Such view can include the cost of union dues or the possibility of strikes. They may also highlight the company’s efforts to address the concerns of their employees. Employees are usually not allowed to ask questions or engage in a dialogue during these meetings. The opposing viewpoint is not usually represented in any way.

What About Captive Audience Meetings in New York?

In New York, with the recent law banning mandatory captive audience meetings, employers are prohibited from requiring employees to attend. If the primary purpose is to share the employer’s opinions on union-related, religious, or political issues, this is illegal.

However, in many other states, captive audience meetings remain legal under the NLRA. It is not illegal as long as the employer does not threaten or promise benefits to employees in exchange for their support or opposition to unionization.

What States Are Banning Captive Audience Meetings?

New York Bans Anti-Union Captive Audience Meeting PracticeIn addition to New York, several other states have recently taken steps to restrict or ban captive audience meetings. Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, and Oregon have all enacted laws limiting employers’ ability to hold mandatory captive audience meetings. California and Vermont also have bills under consideration that would prohibit such meetings.

These state-level efforts reflect a growing concern about the potential coercive nature of these gatherings and their impact on workers’ rights. As more states consider similar legislation, employers must stay informed about the changing legal landscape and adapt their practices accordingly.

Contact Hach & Rose, LLP to Protect Your Rights Today

If you are an employee required to attend a captive audience meeting or an employer seeking guidance on the legality of these gatherings, consult an experienced legal professional. Our New York City worker’s injury lawyers can offer tailored advice based on your specific situation. The attorneys at Hach & Rose, LLP are dedicated to protecting workers’ rights. Our team works with you through the complexities of labor law and how those laws affect your working environment.

To learn more about your legal rights and any options you may have, contact us today at (212) 779-0057 for a confidential consultation. Our knowledgeable team will listen to your concerns and provide the guidance you need to make the best informed decisions.

Related Posts:

Understanding the Workers’ Compensation Process in New York

Unions and Workers’ Compensation: Does Being In a Union Matter?

Conversion Pixel